Photo

Feb 7, 2012
@ 4:25 pm
Permalink
548 notes

bandh:

Want to win a classic? We’re giving away a sterling Canon A1 with 50mm f1.4 lens from our Used Dept.
To enter, just reblog this post and recommend another Tumblr user that you really love following (make sure it’s family friendly! And include a URL.)
All people 18 and over living in the United States can do this once only from 11:00 A.M. E.S.T. on February 7, 2012, until 6:00 P.M. E.S.T. on February 13, 2012. We’ll announce the winner Tuesday, February 14th, 2012 here on our Tumblr, Facebook and Twitter.
Good luck!
See our rules and regulations for more.

bandh:

Want to win a classic? We’re giving away a sterling Canon A1 with 50mm f1.4 lens from our Used Dept.

To enter, just reblog this post and recommend another Tumblr user that you really love following (make sure it’s family friendly! And include a URL.)

All people 18 and over living in the United States can do this once only from 11:00 A.M. E.S.T. on February 7, 2012, until 6:00 P.M. E.S.T. on February 13, 2012. We’ll announce the winner Tuesday, February 14th, 2012 here on our Tumblr, Facebook and Twitter.

Good luck!

See our rules and regulations for more.


Photo

Aug 30, 2011
@ 8:41 am
Permalink
3,752 notes

LOL.
seldo:

This is genuinely Microsoft’s idea of a “streamlined”, “optimized” UI for Windows Explorer. They were so proud of it they wrote a blog post about it.
The post is a sort of masterpiece of crazy rationalization, but I think my favourite part may be this screenshot:
(see link)
Here, they proudly overlay the UI with data from their research into how often various commands are used. They use this to show that “the commands that make up 84% of what users do in Explorer are now in one tab”. But the more important thing is that the remaining 50% of the bar is taken up by buttons that nobody will ever use, ever, even according to Microsoft’s own research. And yet somehow they remain smack bang in the middle of the interface. The insanity is further enriched by this graph:

Again, this is Microsoft’s own research, cited in the same post: nobody — almost literally 0% of users — uses the menu bar, and only 10% of users use the command bar. Nearly everybody is using the context menu or hotkeys. So the solution, obviously, is to make both the menu bar and the command bar bigger and more prominent. Right?
Microsoft UI has officially entered the realm of self-parody.

LOL.

seldo:

This is genuinely Microsoft’s idea of a “streamlined”, “optimized” UI for Windows Explorer. They were so proud of it they wrote a blog post about it.

The post is a sort of masterpiece of crazy rationalization, but I think my favourite part may be this screenshot:

(see link)

Here, they proudly overlay the UI with data from their research into how often various commands are used. They use this to show that “the commands that make up 84% of what users do in Explorer are now in one tab”. But the more important thing is that the remaining 50% of the bar is taken up by buttons that nobody will ever use, ever, even according to Microsoft’s own research. And yet somehow they remain smack bang in the middle of the interface. The insanity is further enriched by this graph:

Again, this is Microsoft’s own research, cited in the same post: nobody — almost literally 0% of users — uses the menu bar, and only 10% of users use the command bar. Nearly everybody is using the context menu or hotkeys. So the solution, obviously, is to make both the menu bar and the command bar bigger and more prominent. Right?

Microsoft UI has officially entered the realm of self-parody.


Photo

Aug 23, 2011
@ 11:03 pm
Permalink

Hipster California.
via Reddit.

Hipster California.

via Reddit.


Photo

Aug 23, 2011
@ 9:42 am
Permalink
239 notes

I wish my workspace could be this awesome. and this clean.
simpledesks:

Submitted by Norb Gergely

I wish my workspace could be this awesome. and this clean.

simpledesks:

Submitted by Norb Gergely

(Source: )


Text

Aug 22, 2011
@ 10:34 pm
Permalink
2 notes

PicPlum. A Quick Review.

You take photos, right? You put them all on your computer, and probably upload them to places like Flickr or Picasa, right? Do you feel like you’re missing something? Something physical?

An actual photograph perhaps?

This missing element is what new Bay Area startup PicPlum is aiming to fill - provide that seemingly lost satisfaction of holding and sharing an actual photograph. 

The overall focus behind PicPlum is simplicity and quality in the process of printing and sharing photo prints. I don’t think there’s an easier way to make and send photo prints to yourself or a loved one. Just upload your best selection of photos and PicPlum will print and send your photos on their way. Automatically. You don’t have to do anything else. And as for quality, the printing process uses [LightJet] printers on high-quality, non-glossy-yet-non-matte “lustre” paper. The photos look great…for the most part* (more on that later).

By default, PicPlum works as a subscription service. For $7 a month, you get a batch of up to 15 prints each sent to whomever month. You can also do a pay-as-you-go plan, as well as paying a bit more each time you want to go over your monthly 15 ($1.50 for shipping and $0.50 per print).

And while PicPlum is currently focused on targeting new parents and parents with young children, it certainly applies to other people as well. I am approaching this review as a photography enthusiast that simply wants to have some lovely prints of my favorite photos that I take. (I find it quite serendipitous that the weekend I decide to experiment with and old film camera, is the same weekend that PicPlum launched.) Prints from every camera now!

And my first batch arrived in the mail today.

As described, the 4” x 6” prints came in a nice, dare I say, plum-colored envelope. Itself was protected by a stiff cardboard envelope to prevent bending. My photos arrived in ship-shape - no bends, tears or any damage.

Most of the photo prints looked fantastic. The printing process, as described, was very high quality and you can’t see any digital artifacting or dot pattern from the printer. 

I uploaded a variety of photos, most being color, but I slipped in a few black and white photos as well. The black and white photos came out brilliantly. I love black and white photos, so it’s nice to find that this service is not color-only.

Now, did you happen to catch that little asterisk I wrote earlier? Yes, not all the photos looked great, unfortunately. And, good thing for PicPlum, I think the issue was more to do with they way certain photos were shot and edited than the printing process.

I had a few photos that had a pretty strong blue gradient in the sky due to the angle of the sun, as well as one photo that I added some vignetting. I think the strong gradient of these colors, the saturation level of the digital photo, and perhaps some color saturation in the printing process itself caused the printer(s) to reach it’s limit on color level graduations. That’s the best way I can describe it. Now I don’t know what printer(s) were used, so I have no way to verify this. It’s just my preliminary judgement. 

( ^ digital version)

( ^ print version - disregard the dust. I never use my scanner!)

Notice how the vignetting is not a smooth gradient in the print version like it is in the digital version.

( ^ digital version)

( ^ print version)

In this comparison, notice how the blue in the sky, again, doesn’t have a smooth gradient in the print version. The print version seems a bit over-saturated. 

Overall, I am very pleased with the experience and the quality of the prints, and I plan to continue to use the service for the time being. Time will tell if I continue with the subscription or bump down to the pay-as-you-use-it account. From what I’ve seen, as long as you watch how the much the saturation levels of the digital photo and how color levels change in big open spaces, such as the sky, your prints should come out looking fantastic. 

 

Verdict: PicPlum gets an A.

 


Text

Dec 11, 2010
@ 9:07 pm
Permalink

LensHero.com. A Quick Review.

Are you a budding photographer, a seasoned enthusiast or even a steady professional and need some help in your next lens purchase? Well, good news everyone! LensHero has come to the rescue to make your lens purchasing endeavor less frustrating and confusing.

Differing from your standard manufacturer listing of lens offerings or confusing comparison charts of the vast array of interchangeable camera lenses, LensHero provides a new way to evaluate and narrow down various lens choices to help find the right one for your needs.

The process begins with some simple questions such as the brand of camera you use and the amount of money you are willing to spend. Next up, it gives you some options to choose from to help narrow down the type of lens you are looking for. You can either sort lenses based on the style of photograph you are trying to achieve, such as macro, wide-angle or portraiture, or you can narrow down your choices based on focal length ranges. For example, if you know you’re not planning on shooting bird photos, you can narrow down the focal length to exclude the super-telephoto ranges of 300mm and longer. There is also a way to get automatic lens suggestions based on the lenses you already have.

Hit the “Go” button and you presented with your list of lens choices, custom-chosen based on your preferences. You then get lens specs, reviews, prices and store options to make your purchase.

There are also ways to browse all lenses by a variety of categories, such as by manufacturer or lens mount type – why browse through a bunch of Nikon F-mount lenses if you shoot with Canon EF-mount glass?

Overall, it is a very simple yet comprehensive service that works really well to help determine which lens is right for you, your equipment and, probably most importantly, your budget. However, budget is a relative term – (they have Leica lenses on there too). So, if you have been struggling and agonizing over what lens to buy next, let LensHero assist you. Shoot away.


Link

May 3, 2010
@ 1:15 am
Permalink

Your Office Chair Is Killing You. »

Awesome read. I’m thinking of converting to a standing desk. Just to see what it’s like.


Photo

Mar 8, 2010
@ 11:28 pm
Permalink

Take that, Dreamworks!

Take that, Dreamworks!


Text

Mar 5, 2010
@ 11:54 pm
Permalink

I think I figured out Lost.

The Man In Black talks about “all they do is fight, destroy, corrupt”, and Jacob wants to “prove him wrong” - Jacob wants to prove that man is inherently good, whereas MiB believes that man is inherently evil.

See video for the important MiB, Jacob discussion from Season 5.